ABUSE OF PROCESS model jury charge 3.30D
ABUSE OF PROCESS model jury charge 3.30D
The plaintiffs in this action allege that the defendant is liable for abuse of process. The defendant denies the allegation.
There
are two basic elements necessary to sustain the cause of action of
abuse of process. They are (1) that the defendant made an improper,
illegal and perverted use of the legal procedure, that is to say,
his/her resort to the legal process was neither warranted nor authorized
by law,[1] and (2) that the defendant had an ulterior motive in initiating the legal process. In other words, abuse of process is the misuse or misapplication of the legal procedure in a manner not contemplated by law.
Specifically,
the plaintiff contends that the defendant utilized the legal process to
intimidate, harass and coerce the plaintiff in order to obtain a
collateral advantage. In
other words, the plaintiff contends that the defendant invoked the legal
process to accomplish some unlawful end, namely, to compel the
plaintiff to do some collateral thing which he/she could not legally be
compelled to do.
The
defendant denies this allegation and asserts that he, the defendant,
made a regular and legitimate use of the process. The defendant contends
that he/she employed the legal process to have his/her claims
adjudicated or to enforce legitimate claims.
In short, in order for the plaintiff to prevail in this action, he/she
must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant made an
improper, illegal, and perverted use of the process and that there
existed an ulterior motive or purpose on part of the defendant.
If you find that the use of the process was a proper one, then I charge
you as a matter of law that the motive is immaterial. The legal
pursuits of ones rights, no matter what may be the motive of the
promoter of the action, cannot be deemed either illegal or inequitable.
It is the misuse of the process, though properly obtained, which
constitutes the misconduct for which liability is imposed.
If you find, therefore, that the defendant made a perverted use of
legal procedure for which it was not designed, with an ulterior purpose,
than I charge you as a matter of law, the law provides a redress and
the defendant is thereby liable to the plaintiff.
No comments:
Post a Comment