Kenneth Vercammen (732) 572-0500

2053 Woodbridge Ave. Edison, NJ 08817

Ken is a NJ trial attorney who has published 130 articles in national and New Jersey publications on litigation topics. He was awarded the NJ State Bar Municipal Court Practitioner of the Year. He lectures for the Bar and handles litigation matters. He is Past Chair of the ABA Tort & Insurance Committee, GP on Personal Injury and lectured at the ABA Annual Meeting attended by 10,000 attorneys and professionals.

New clients email us evenings and weekends go to www.njlaws.com/ContactKenV.htm

Thursday, October 6, 2016

Model Jury charge 2.23 DISCRIMINATORY LAYOFF OR REDUCTION


Model Jury charge 2.23 DISCRIMINATORY LAYOFF OR REDUCTION IN FORCE (RIF) NJ
Plaintiff has contended that the layoff or reduction in force at [employers name] was conducted in a discriminatory manner. In order to establish an initial case that a layoff was discriminatory, a plaintiff must show that:
1. He/She is a member of a protected class; and
2. He/She was laid off while other not in the protected class were treated favorably.1
It is plaintiffs burden to prove both of these elements by a preponderance of the evidence.
1Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706F. 2d 111 (3d Cir.),cert. den., 464U.S.937 (1983).

No comments: