Civil Model Jury Charge 3.20 C FALSE IMPRISONMENT (FALSE ARREST) IN NJ
Civil Model Jury Charge3.20 C FALSE IMPRISONMENT (FALSE ARREST) CITIZENS ARRESTFOR A CRIME WITHOUT A WARRANT
It
is the law of this State that a private citizen may lawfully arrest
another person without a warrant if he/she knows that a crime has
actually been committed and that there is probable or reasonable cause
to suspect that the person he/she arrested did it.
When
such an arrest without a warrant is made, the prisoner must be taken
without unnecessary delay before the nearest available judge or other
appropriate governmental official, a complaint promptly filed and a
warrant issued based on the complaint.
The
offense for which it was alleged that the defendant arrested the
plaintiff was a crime for which a citizens arrest may be made. (Here
discuss facts of arrest and detention).
So, in deciding whether plaintiff was falsely imprisoned, there are two decisions you have to make.
The
first is whether plaintiff has proven, by the greater weight of the
evidence, that defendant intentionally detained or restrained plaintiff
in his/her personal liberty or freedom of movement by arresting him/her.CHARGE 3.20C Page 2 of 4
The
second decision, assuming you find that defendant did intentionally
restrain plaintiff by an arrest, involves defendants claim that he/she
had a right to make the arrest and that the confinement was only for a
reasonable period of time. Here, the defendant must prove this to you by
the greater weight of the evidence. So you must decide, one, whether
defendant had actual knowledge that the specific crime [insert type of
crime] had been committed; two, if so, whether the defendant also had
reasonable or probable cause to believe that plaintiff committed that
crime; and three, if so, did defendant restrain plaintiff only for a
reasonable period of time before bringing plaintiff before a judge or
another appropriate governmental official.
Reasonable
or probable cause would be that the facts and circumstances known to
the defendant were such as would lead a reasonably cautious person to
believe that the plaintiff had committed the crime. It must be more than
mere conjecture or unfounded suspicion.
A
reasonable period of time would be only that length of time that was
necessary under the circumstances that a reasonable person would need to
bring plaintiff to a judge or other appropriate governmental official
in the circumstances facing defendant.CHARGE 3.20C Page 3 of 4
The
reasonableness of this time would be affected by the availability of
the judge or official, the location of the arrest, the time of day or
night, the problem of confining the plaintiff using available means
while reaching the judge or official and any other factors that you
might think have a bearing on the amount of time. If the defendant
imprisoned the plaintiff for an unreasonable time then, notwithstanding
the original legality of the confinement, the unreasonable detention
would constitute false arrest. On the other hand, if the arrest was
proper and the confinement reasonable according to the rules I have
explained, then you must find for the defendant. But if you find that
there was a confinement, and you find that either there was no right to
make the arrest or that the confinement was for an unreasonable period
of time, then you must find for plaintiff.
[go on to Damages (False Imprisonment (False Arrest)), Charge 8.47C]
NOTE TO JUDGE
A
citizen has the right to arrest without a warrant where it appears that
a crime had actually been committed, and that there was probable or
reasonable cause to fairly suspect the person arrested to be guilty.Brown v. State, 62N.J.L. 666 (E. & A. 1889),affirmed175U.S. 172;Reuck v. McGregor, 32N.J.L.
70 (Sup. Ct. 1866). Although New Jersey Law does not categorize crimes
as felonies, for the purpose of arrest law a common law felony
corresponds to a crime for which a person may be incarcerated for more
than one year in a State prison.CHARGE 3.20C Page 4 of 4
To
supplement the citizens common law right of arrest, the Legislature has
granted additional authority to the individual to make warrantless
arrests where a disorderly persons offense has been committed in his/her
presence.N.J.S.A. 2A:169-3 provides:
Whenever
an offense is committed in his/her presence any constable or police
officer shall, and any other persons may, apprehend without warrant or
process any disorderly person, and take him/her before any magistrate of
the county where apprehended.
No comments:
Post a Comment