Civil Model Jury Charge 3.30A UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE WITH PR IN NJ |
Civil Model Jury Charge3.30A UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE WITH PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE
The
right of a person to pursue a lawful business and to enjoy the fruits
and advantages of ones industry or efforts are rights which the law
protects against unjustified and wrongful interference by another
person.
Thus, the law protects a persons interest in reasonable expectations of economic advantage.
In
order that the plaintiff may recover damages for a wrongful act, such
wrongful act must be found to have interfered with a reasonable
expectancy of economic advantage or benefit on the part of the
plaintiff.
Thus, plaintiff must prove the following elements:
1.The existence of a reasonable expectation of economic advantage or benefit belonging or accruing to the plaintiff;
2.That the defendant had knowledge of such expectancy of economic advantage;
3.That the defendant wrongfully and without justification interfered with plaintiffs expectancy of economic advantage or benefit;
4.That
in the absence of the wrongful act of the defendant it is reasonably
probable that the plaintiff would have realized his/her economic
advantage or benefit (i.e., effected the sale of the property and received a commission); and
5.That the plaintiff sustained damages as a result thereof.
It
is for you to determine, therefore, whether the plaintiff has
established by a preponderance of the evidence all of the elements
outlined above.If you so find, then you should return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.Otherwise, you should find for the defendant.
Cases:
Harris
v. Perl, 41 N.J. 455 (1964); Middlesex Concrete, etc., Corp. v.
Carteret Industrial Assn., 37 N.J. 507 (1962); Raymond v. Cregar, 38
N.J. 472 (1962); Rainiers Dairies v. Raritan Val. Farms, 19 N.J. 552
(1955); Myers v. Arcadio, Inc., 73 N.J. Super. 493 (App. Div. 1962);
Independent Dairy Workers Union of Hightstown v. Milk Drivers, etc.,
Local No. 680 30 N.J. 173 (1959); Restatement (Second) of Torts, Section
766 (1939).
|
Monday, March 28, 2016
Civil Model Jury Charge 3.30A UNLAWFUL INTERFERENCE WITH PR IN NJ
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment