Kenneth Vercammen (732) 572-0500

2053 Woodbridge Ave. Edison, NJ 08817

Ken is a NJ trial attorney who has published 130 articles in national and New Jersey publications on litigation topics. He was awarded the NJ State Bar Municipal Court Practitioner of the Year. He lectures for the Bar and handles litigation matters. He is Past Chair of the ABA Tort & Insurance Committee, GP on Personal Injury and lectured at the ABA Annual Meeting attended by 10,000 attorneys and professionals.

New clients email us evenings and weekends go to www.njlaws.com/ContactKenV.htm

Monday, March 28, 2016

Civil Model Jury Charge 3.20A FALSE IMPRISONMENT (FALSE ARREST) IN NJ

Civil Model Jury Charge 3.20A FALSE IMPRISONMENT (FALSE ARREST) IN NJ

Civil Model Jury Charge3.20A FALSE IMPRISONMENT (FALSE ARREST) model jury charge
A. GENERAL RULES TO BE CHARGED IN ALL CASES
False imprisonment is the unlawful detention of an individual. In this context the word detention means the restraint of a persons personal liberty or freedom of movement and the word unlawful means without legal authority or justification.
An unlawful restraint may result from actual force or by threats consisting of words or conduct if the words or conduct are such as to include a reasonable apprehension of force and the means of coercion are at hand.
The unlawful detention need not be for more than a minimal length of time since even a brief restraint of a persons freedom is sufficient to constitute false imprisonment.
The restraint must be against the plaintiffs will. If he/she agreed of his/her own free choice to surrender his/her freedom of motion or personal liberty, there is no false imprisonment.CHARGE 3.20A Page 2 of 2
To be a false imprisonment, the defendants conduct in restraining the plaintiff must have been done with the intention of causing a confinement. A purely accidental confinement without the intent to confine is not a false imprisonment nor is the confinement merely because of the negligence of defendant a false imprisonment.
It is not necessary that a defendant was motivated by malice in the sense of ill will or a desire to injure, although, as I shall explain shortly, the presence or absence of malice may be shown to increase or minimize damages.
(Here discuss facts relied upon by plaintiff to establish the false imprisonment. If the defendant denies that plaintiff was, in fact, falsely imprisoned or alleges that it was not intentional or that it was voluntary on plaintiffs part, etc., that issue should be stated to the jury. If the detention was under assertion of legal authority the appropriate section of the following should be added.)

No comments: